The News Behind the Story

Back in January 2015 a story broke about a study by Portland State University chemists on e-cigarettes showing the levels of formaldehyde were higher than in traditional cigarettes. The researchers weren’t looking for formaldehyde, it was by accident that they found it, but they couldn’t sweep this finding under the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, so to speak.  What they discovered was that formaldehyde is hidden, because it attaches itself to another molecule, and “in this unstable form, it could be released again in the body.”  In their own scientific, easy-to-understand words, they “detected a boatload of it,” although they admitted they didn’t know if it was dangerous or “benign.”

The findings, published in the New England Journal of Medicine, compared the amount of formaldehyde (a human carcinogen) produced by smoking a pack of cigarettes a day versus the amount of formaldehyde hemiacetal in aerosol particles in vaped e-cigs.  Not only was the formaldehyde hemiacetal 5 times higher, it was 15 times “as tall as the amount of formaldehyde gas discovered in a 2014 study of vaped e-cigarettes.”  It was also higher than the “concentration of nicotine,” which is not a carcinogen.  The original intent of the study was to find out if flavorings used in e-cigarettes were safe to inhale. It had nothing to do with formaldehyde, but when levels were found at such high levels, the researchers looked into it.

vaporUsing a common tank model e-cigarette with a variable-voltage battery, the researchers did not detect the formation of any formaldehyde-releasing agents at low voltage (3.3 V), but did at high voltage (5.0 V).  Their results created a vapor storm of comments by e-cigarette proponents who stated that the high voltage used by the researchers was unrealistic, would taste horrible and would be too harsh for users to inhale.  But by the time you have inhaled and discovered the harsh, unpleasant taste, “you’re exposing yourself to those conditions.  This level is a known phenomenon.”   The researchers also believe that “formaldehyde-releasing agents may deposit more efficiently in the respiratory tract than gaseous formaldehyde.”  As one of the researchers stated, “it’s pretty well known that inhaling cigars is unpleasant, but people do it.”

As they have moved forward, the researchers have continued to look at the formaldehyde issue using a variety of e-cigarette models, including a “dripper” in which users manually drop the e-liquid “onto the heating coil” in order to produce bigger vapor.  This also produces high formaldehyde levels.  The PSU team will be preparing a new article for the New England Journal of Medicine for the spring which “will address some of the controversies and will show results from the new round of research.”

CLICK HERE for the original article and HERE for the latest article.

Posted in Cigarettes, Diseases, E-Cigarettes, Smoking, Tobacco market | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

World Oceans Day 2015

oceans_day

Florida has over 8,400 miles of coastline including tidal areas, and whether you like the soft white powder beaches of the gulf or the coarse sand and rough surf of the Atlantic, Florida beaches are well loved by residents and tourists alike.  That’s why it is so important to understand the impact we are having on our oceans by discarding cigarettes on the ground, whether you are miles from the beach or sitting with your toes in the surf.  On World Oceans Day, take a moment to read some ideas on what you can do to help keep our oceans healthy.

Cigarette butts, one of the most littered item in the world, make their way from our sidewalks and streets through storm drains that carry it out to our oceans.  Beach goers add to the litter by disposing their butts at the beach.  Only a small portion of the litter is cleaned up, the rest becomes food for animals and birds and washes out into the ocean.

Most people believe that cigarette butts are biodegradable, but they are not.  While cellulose fibers degrade naturally, most filters are made up of over 12,000 white cellulose acetate plastic fibers which looks like cotton, but degrades very slowly.  The heavy metal toxins trapped by the filter slowly leach out, killing or injuring the wildlife.

Since tobacco litter makes up between 25% and 50% of all visible litter and costs millions every year to clean up, some ideas have been proposed to reduce the amount since it isn’t going to go away anytime soon.  Some believe that since the tobacco industry is responsible for producing a “toxic waste product,” they should be held accountable for the cleanup.  This could be achieved by substantially increasing taxes on tobacco products which would be used for clean up.  Another way to reduce litter is for the tobacco industry to have a “mandatory take-back policy.”  Prohibiting smoking, whether traditional or electronic cigarettes,in all outdoor public spaces, such as parks and beaches, and imposing stiff fines for those caught breaking the laws would be a great start to cleaning up the beaches.

While none of these ideas will be implemented anytime soon, our oceans need a change from the casual, indiscriminate tossing of toxic waste onto our beautiful beaches.  Since the tobacco industry doesn’t seem to want the responsibility of cleaning up a mess they created, perhaps it is time new laws are put into place and enforced as to where people can smoke in public.

CLICK HERE for information on the environmental impact of cigarettes.

 

Posted in Cigarettes, E-Cigarettes, Smoking | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

New Season, New Ads

The start of summer has heralded a new crop of summer tobacco ads courtesy of Trinkets and Trash Surveillance Update for May 2015.  It is always amusing to see what is out there in tobacco-land.

virginia_slimsVirginia Slims has changed its slogan from “You’ve Come a Long Way Baby” to “Come What May,” which is odd for a tobacco slogan.  Sort of a cheeky way of telling your customer, “use our product, but whatever happens to you is your problem.”

Marlboro has moved from their famous “Come to where the flavor is” to their “Maybe” campaign, which caused an uproar for targeting youth in Europe, to their new “Bold” campaign.  Instead of the original cowboy riding a horse on the range, these new youthful cowboys are everyday people riding their motorcycle in the ocean, something you could see yourself Marlborodoing. Whether he is a maybe or is being bold, he’s not smoking in the picture, and neither should you.  While you are deciding how bold you want to be, Marlboro Gold offers you a chance to vote on the next Team Marlboro environmental project that will receive $25,000. Having a tobacco company sponsor an environmental project is an oxymoron, considering cigarette production is one of the most damaging industries to the environment in terms of stripping the land of forestation.  By the way, the projects you are voting for are for replanting forests and $25,000 doesn’t go very far.  It makes Marlboro look like they care about the environment, after they strip it of trees, pollute it with fertilizers and pesticides, and litter it with the end product.

General_snusIn smokeless tobacco news General Snus is showing us that “it’s warm out there,” as they promote their in-store chillers to keep their smokeless tobacco cool.  But the ad really makes no sense.  If it is warm out there, why would you be dressed in a heavy jacket and long pants?  Wouldn’t you want to show your model cooling off with a chilled dip enjoying warm weather activities?  As for the chilled tobacco, how many users are really going to keep it refrigerated, especially when the majority of users don’t want their other half to know they are still dipping?  Good thing this smokeless tobacco user is outside, he doesn’t need to be holding his spit cup.

In electronic cigarette news, Mark Ten is adding color to their ads to show off their flavored products.  Instead of their black/white with a splash of red, you can now chose your flavor according to one of four color themes: winter mint, classic, fusion and menthol.   NJOY had an exclusive offer available at Walgreens stores (as well as Love’s Country Stores) to receive 2 free flavor chambers with a purchase of a multi-kit.  Imagine that, a drug store getting an exclusive offer to sell an addictive drug.  E-cigarette producers continue to market new products, but they are being left in a cloud of vapor by the independent fill-your-own pens that allow you to flavor your own poison.

Kudos to both Outdoor Life and Latina for featuring “Tips From Former Smokers” in their magazines.  While many readers only see the glossed over version of tobacco in ads, it’s wonderful these two magazines decided to show the damaging effects caused by tobacco or e-cigarette use.

CLICK HERE to see more of the May 2015 Trinkets & Trash Surveillance Update.

 

 

Posted in Cigarettes, Diseases, E-Cigarettes, Smokeless tobacco, Smoking, Tobacco market | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

What’s Happening with Tobacco in Florida – Participants’ Views

This past year on the Florida Tobacco Prevention Online Course, we asked our participants to present their perspective on local, state and federal laws and the effectiveness of enforcement in the law forum.  Participants were asked to share information on their district and school policies concerning tobacco use, the overlooked violations and the ramifications that students experience when caught for possession and use of both smoking and smokeless products.  The responses they provided were eye opening and show what is happening in some of our Florida counties.

After going through our course, many participants are divided on tobacco laws.  While some believe laws have lead to a reduction of underage use, many others believe the tobacco laws, as they are now, are ineffective, as is the enforcement of said laws.  A participant from Palm Beach said she has witnessed teens purchasing tobacco products without showing proof of their age and feels tobacco violations aren’t a priority to law enforcement.  Other participants reported they have seen students smoking in front of stores or walking down the street smoking and nothing is done about it.  Some participants felt that while flavored cigarettes are no longer allowed, all flavored tobacco needs to be addressed as it is extremely popular with teens, and this issue needs to be addressed quickly.  One participant from Miami-Dade, however, stated his county has a flavored tobacco ban covering cigars and chewing tobacco as it is a “starter” product for teens.  Many participants felt Florida should raise the tobacco tax on cigarettes from the current $1.33/pack to further dissuade youth from purchasing cigarettes.

E-cigarettes and vape pens are more prevalent than cigarettes in schools these days, and several participants stated that their schools provided them with training for spotting e-cigarettes.  A participant from Palm Beach County stated that several students purchased hookah pens and were selling them on her campus, while another PBC participant said he noticed a decrease in smoky student bathrooms which may be stemming from use of vaping devices.  Another Palm Beach participant noted that even though he teaches at a middle school, e-cigarettes are an issue with some of the students. A participant from Wakulla County stated this past year there were only two instances of tobacco use on campus and both involved e-cigarettes.  One participant noted that an underage student was caught with an e-cigarette in class and said his parents bought it for him.  Another participant said an elementary student was caught using a vape pen in class which he probably had taken from his mother’s tobacco shop.  The student was suspended and afterwards the administrators talked to the class about vape pens, and the everlasting health problems associated with them.  One participant stated her principal said smoking on campus has dwindled, but vape pens are so readily available and are glamorized.  The students say they are using the pens because they have been told they are not are bad for them as real cigarettes.  One participant said her principal has a no-nonsense approach to tobacco on her campus.  This principal has sent automated messages to parents reminding them that e-cigarettes are illegal for minors.  If caught, they will be confiscated and given to police as evidence.  One student served as an example when he was expelled this year, and the entire student body have been much more weary about showing off their e-cigarettes.

When it comes to suspensions, schools across Florida appear to differ, even within the same district.   In many instances smoking materials are confiscated, students are written up, and parents are called.  In some cases, suspensions are not handed out until the second or third violation as the “ultimate goal is to educate the students about the dangers of tobacco use instead of simply suspending from school which would actually give them more time to engage in the activity.”  One participant from St. Lucie County said the students at her school had a choice of a smoke-free class with their parents for six weeks (one day a week) or a two day suspension  for the first violation.  Most took the suspension because parents had to work.  Sadly, the parents were aware their child was smoking, but felt they couldn’t tell their child what do to if they themselves were smoking.  Another participant from Miami-Dade said getting caught with tobacco is a 1 to 5 day suspension, depending on the student and if they are a repeat discipline problem.  A Palm Beach participant said “first and second violations are dealt with an immediate 5 day out of school suspension.”  Another Palm Beach participant who spoke to her school police, stated she was told tobacco products in a student’s possession is a 10 day out of school suspension.  One participant stated that since he is at an alternative education center, they have an unusually high percentage of former and suspected drug/tobacco users and have had to crackdown hard on violators to set an example for the students and parents.  A Clay County participant said students caught with tobacco go to “Tobacco Court” and have to serve mandatory community service for their offense as well as school suspension.  It sends a powerful message to the kids that this is not only a serious offense, it is an inconvenience.  The students didn’t like it, but it dramatically reduced tobacco use.  One participant said her district “does not have a zero tolerance rule for tobacco, but her school is stricter.  She stated that students having tobacco will get you suspended, finding it a second time or using it will get you expelled. However, if a student is found using smokeless tobacco, they are only suspended, not expelled as with smoking.  A Brevard participant stated they “issue a $35 ticket to those under the age of 18 who are caught on school grounds with tobacco products” as well as issued suspensions.   Finally, a participant from Pinellas County stated that their schools and All Children’s Hospital has been partnering to offer students who get caught using tobacco on campus to attend an educational program rather than suspension for the first offense.

There are policies in place for tobacco-free campuses, according to participants, but not all policies are enforced whether students or employees.  One participant from Martin County said that the boys using smokeless tobacco at the high school did not seem to have the same rules applied to them. Participants from St. Lucie County and Miami Dade schools have observed teachers smoking in their parked cars during breaks, and one noted the smell of tobacco smoke in the faculty bathroom.  One participant in Broward stated that while they have a tobacco-free policy in place, the “cafeteria ladies take a smoke break outside the back entrance to the kitchen,” and the administration says “well, no one sees.” Another St. Lucie participant witnessed teachers opening up their windows in their classroom to smoke, as well as smoking in areas visible to students, visitors, etc.  Many Palm Beach participants stated that while the majority of employees follow the no smoking policy, not everyone does, and many are still allowed to continue to smoke on campus.

On the other side of the coin, participants stated that the tobacco policy is highly enforced among employees, teachers, and parents, not just among students.  A participant from Bradford County stated her administrator has given verbal warnings to parents and bus drivers seen smoking at the edge of campus boundaries.  A Palm Beach County participant said the administration informs visitors of their violation and they are asked to stop.  Their failure to comply leads to them being escorted off campus.  One Brevard participant said a teacher was fired for smoking a cigarette in his car during one of his breaks.

The biggest complaint participants stated was that while their school had a tobacco policy in place and was “tobacco-free,” the worse violators were the parents who were in the drop-off line and nothing was said or done.  They would like the school districts to enforce the tobacco-free policy in the drop-off lines.  One participant said her principal has told parents to put out their cigarettes while waiting in line for their children.  Another participant stated that his administration has had to “break up smokers in the stadium at a football game” even though there is a tobacco policy in place.  A Broward participant said you can see parents lighting up behind the bleachers and in the parking lot during sporting events and nothing is done about it.  The majority of participants would like to see stronger consequences for those visitors who violate the tobacco policy on campus as it sets a bad example for the students.

Some participants spoke of underage students being able to purchase tobacco products without much problem in their counties and would like to see stricter laws in place for the violators, both the teens and the store owners.  One participant in Dade County and another in Broward said the “Mom and Pop” type of convenience stores do not often ask for ID to purchase tobacco products.

A participant stated that her district does not do enough when it comes to giving students the necessary knowledge about all tobacco products.  While she said she tries to teach an anti-smoking lesson every year, for the most part the students know very little about the effects of tobacco yet still continue to use the products.

One participant summed up Florida tobacco policies nicely.  He said that while a Florida statute appears to penalize those who know or should know that they are distributing tobacco products to minors, the “level of offense – a second-degree felony – is grossly disproportionate to the amount of damage the act of selling these products to minors can do.  You cannot increase the threat against the minors themselves for purchasing tobacco because they have little to lose.  However “the adults – the store owners, neighbors, family members and so on – who have something to lose” should be held accountable.  While many school districts have consequences in place under the Student Code of Conduct, “there are only vague intimations about consequences for staff members, and no consequences listed for non-student and non-employee visitors who violate this policy.” School policies are a first step, but enforcement of these policies for everyone is necessary.

 

 

Posted in Cigarettes, E-Cigarettes, Smoking, Tobacco Prevention | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

2015 World No Tobacco Day

Tobacco kills up to half of its users and this epidemic “is one of the biggest public health 2015_world_no_tobacco_daythreats the world has ever faced.”  The World Health Organization has used May 31, World No Tobacco Day, to focus on various ways to stop this tobacco epidemic.  In 2012, the focus was on the aggressive attempts tobacco uses to “undermine global tobacco control efforts.”  Bans on advertising, promotion and sponsorships was the theme of the 2013 observance.  Last year, 2014, the focus was on raising taxes to reduce consumption.   The 2015 theme is for countries to work together to “end the illicit trade of tobacco products,” which costs countries billions in lost tax and customs revenue.

According to the World Health Organization site, “illicit tobacco may account for as much as one is every 10 cigarettes consumed globally.”  Illicit tobacco hurts people and control policies, taking revenue away from the government, while increasing wealth and power of organized crime activities.  The World Health Organization is using this day to also request the Parties to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC) promote the ratification of, accession to and use of the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products.

ashtrayIn addition to the five goals of the World No Tobacco Day 2015 campaign, there are four key public messages as to why “illicit trade of tobacco products is detrimental to your health and your interests,” as well as calls to action for policy makers and the public. Members of academia are also called to action to “undertake additional research on the subject of the illicit trade of tobacco products to further document its harmful impacts” and to provide research into the “active role the tobacco industry plays in supporting the illicit tobacco trade.”

Click HERE to read more about the scale of the problem of illicit tobacco trade, and HERE to read some facts on tobacco.

Posted in Cigarettes, International, Legal, Smoking, Tobacco market | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

E-cigarettes: Nicotine delivery system or drug paraphernalia

School districts throughout the United States have included electronic cigarettes in their anti-tobacco policies, but some have taken it to another level by listing the devices as drug paraphernalia.  While using tobacco on a school campus can get you a detention, using an e-cigarette in some school districts could net you a long suspension, drug testing and possession of drug paraphernalia charges.  And drug charges could go on your permanent record and keep you from getting into a college.

States, such as North Carolina, New Jersey, Washington, Connecticut, and Pennsylvania are grouping e-cigarettes with the likes of bongs and pipes which makes sense because the devices can be loaded with more than just flavored liquid nicotine.  Used as a drug delivery device, electronic cigarettes or vape pens can be loaded with THC or liquid hashish (hash oil), as well as liquid synthetic cannabis.  A particular synthetic drug sold over the counter and used in vape pens just recently sent several Michigan high school students to the hospital, one in critical condition.

E-cigarettes or vape pens are easily hidden and using them, whether with liquid nicotine or THC oil, produces very little smell.  Students have been known to use them in school or in class behind the teacher’s back without getting caught.

While “the National Association of State Boards of Education doesn’t have an official policy on e-cigarettes, the executive director said she believes the group would recommend that the devices be treated as tobacco products.”  Unless, of course, the district is having a problem with the devices, “then sending a really clear message may be a good idea.”  It is always best to use good judgment and discretion, according to the NASBE executive director.

Click HERE for the entire story.

 

Posted in E-Cigarettes, Legal, Smoking, Tobacco market | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Tobacco Ingredients on Display

This year our participants have far exceeded our expectations in creativity for assignments in the Florida Tobacco Prevention on-line course.  They have taken the topics given to them and truly made them their own.  The participants have also been willing to have their work shared with others.  The following essay was for the chemical assignment.  The criteria chosen by this participant was for them to share their perspective on why tobacco has been exempt from displaying ingredients while other items that are for human consumption must show details of what goes into their products.  We also asked what changes should be made and do they see them happing in the near future.  Thank you Tim Bove from St. Lucie School District for your essay.

The question remains as to why tobacco products are not required – in the interest of full disclosure – to reveal their entire ingredient list, as are other products monitored and regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). There seem to be two components to this answer, neither of which is sufficient in its own right, but, when combined together, provide a compelling explanation for this phenomenon.

First and foremost is the very nature of tobacco products themselves. As it is summarized by one source, this agency “is responsible for protecting and promoting public health through the regulation and supervision of food safety, tobacco products, dietary supplements, prescription and over the-counter pharmaceutical drugs (medications), vaccines, biopharmaceuticals, blood transfusions, medical devices, electromagnetic radiation emitting devices (ERED), cosmetics, animal foods & feed and veterinary products” (Wikipedia, n/d, “Food”). While the agency was originally intended to monitor and provide product control for foodstuffs, drugs, and medical devices and equipment, it has only recently seen fit to expand its purview to other substances, technologies, and procedures that affect health, either directly or indirectly. Its regulation over tobacco products, for example, only dates back to 2009, with the passage of the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (Wikipedia, n/d, “Food”). As yet, the agency appears unsure as to how to go about regulating these particular products, which are not technically food, drugs, or medical substances. It appears that the FDA has two choices:  It can continue its current campaign to regulate factors surrounding smoking, like advertising, accessibility to minors, and warning labels on packaging; or it can treat tobacco products as inherently dangerous recreational products that are purposely designed to kill their targets, even when used as intended. The first is a more cost-effective and legally-justifiable approach, and it appears that this will be the one taken in the foreseeable future.

The second issue in tobacco labeling is the list of ingredients itself. There is no issue regarding the additives to cigarettes and other tobacco products; a comprehensive list of about 600 ingredients has been submitted to the United States Department of Health and Human Services as early as 1994 (Wikipedia, n/d, “List”). While these ingredients could be displayed on every package of tobacco product sold, the rationale for doing so is unclear.  How would this list benefit the average consumer, who would still remain woefully unaware of the health consequences of even the most dangerous chemicals on the list? After all, this list of ingredients is already available to the public, but it goes largely unused and, when used, is not very well understood. How are tobacco products different than other readily available consumables? It is rare to find warning labels on apples or blueberries, for instance, which regularly make the list of fruits containing the most pesticide residue at point of sale  (blueberries, for example, exhibiting at times more than fifty dangerous pesticides when sold to the public) (Good  Housekeeping, n/d). While it is reasonable to hold tobacco products to the same standards as other consumables, it would be questionable to hold them to a higher standard simply due to their unpopularity among certain activist groups. Finally, the list of ingredients that go into cigarettes is simply unhelpful due to the dissimilarity between this list and the list of substances that come out of tobacco products when they are used: “When burned, they create more than 7,000 chemicals. At least 69 of these chemicals are known to cause cancer, and many are poisonous” (American Lung Association, n/d). It is this list that has the potential to help consumers, but is, once again, both overwhelmingly long and difficult to comprehend.

The simplest way to remedy this situation is two-fold. First, disclosure should be based on what is reasonably expected to happen when the product is used as intended. After all, the warnings on heat producing appliances, for example, are based not on what goes in but on what comes out. Ingredients should be listed, not in the order of quantity (as is commonly done with foodstuffs), but in the order of quality (with the most toxic elements noted upfront). Second, however, is the more obvious solution: Tobacco products should be regulated for what they are, which is a delivery system for dangerous chemicals that endangers the user and those around him or her as well. Quite simply, if we discovered that a manufacturer was producing and selling products containing dangerous chemicals, we would normally fine the manufacturer and immediately recall the products (see, e.g., the recall of Chinese products ranging from toothpaste and pet food to children’s toys and lipstick, all containing lead (Wikipedia, n/d, “2007”)). The only reason that tobacco products are not regulated the same as other dangerous and toxic chemical delivery systems is that they have a much better legal defense team.

References:
– American Lung Association. (n/d). What’s in a cigarette? Retrieved from http://www.lung.org/stopsmoking/about-smoking/facts-figures/whats-in-a-cigarette.html
– Good Housekeeping. (n/d). The new dirty dozen: 22 foods to eat organic. Retrieved from 
http://www.goodhousekeeping.com/food-recipes/healthy/news/g168/dirty-dozen-foods/
– Wikipedia. (n/d). 2007 Chinese export recalls. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Chinese_export_recalls
– Wikipedia. (n/d). Food and Drug Administration. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food_and_Drug_Administration
– Wikipedia. (n.d). List of additives in cigarettes. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_additives_in_cigarettes

 

 

 

 

Posted in Big Tobacco, Cigarettes, Smoking, Tobacco market | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Less Harmful is Not Harmless

e-cig_002You said you would never smoke, but once electronic cigarettes became popular and you heard they were safe, you gave them a try.  Or maybe you have been a long-time smoker and decide to switch from cigarettes to the new electronic smoking fad because you heard it’s better for your lungs than all the chemicals in smoke from tobacco products.  A new study may have you thinking about this new craze.

E-cigarettes, personal vaporizers, vape pens–whatever you want to call them–have only been on the market for a few years.  Researchers are just now reporting findings from their studies as to whether these devices pose any harm for users.  While many believe they are less harmful than traditional cigarettes, the question is, are they harmless?  The answer to that question is…no.

U.S. researchers conducted a small study and looked at how e-cigarettes affect the lungs. They found the vapor “affects cells in the lungs in the same way as cigarette smoke, even after just one hour.”  In normal lungs, the walls of the alveoli which exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide, are made up of protein.  They break down and they re-generate themselves and function correctly in a process known as proteostatis.  In smoker’s lungs, this process doesn’t function in the same way; the alveoli become damaged and don’t re-generate, meaning fewer alveoli to exchange the much-needed oxygen.  That’s why people with emphysema have such a difficult time breathing.

emphysemaThe researchers exposed cells from the lining of the bronchi, the tubes that carry oxygen to the lungs, to e-cigarette vapor from one to six hours.  Even the minimal exposure “disrupted the protein processes in cells ‘significantly’.” The mice that were exposed to e-cigarette vapors also showed the same damage. Researchers are worried that this exposure to e-cigarette vapor could lead to COPD.

There are long-term studies on the health effects of smoking cigarettes, but not on using e-cigarettes.  Even with the reduced harm of e-cigarettes, researchers are concerned that the use could lead to chronic lung conditions.

You can read the entire article HERE

 

 

Posted in Diseases, E-Cigarettes, Smoking, Tobacco market | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Spring Ads in Tobacco Land

We love getting our monthly Trinkets and Trash newsletter to keep up with the advertising from the tobacco industry which is always ready to exploit an event, and the April newsletter is no different.

April brought us April Fool’s Day and some in the tobacco industry decided to prank their customers, sort of.  Skoal pretended that they forgot to send out coupons for the month.  April Fool’s…you had to go to their website to get your coupon.  That prank probably saved Skoal quite a bit of money in mailing costs.  But it could have also cost them because you keep your customers when they get something in their hand they didn’t have to work for, like making a copy of a coupon.  It could be Skoal got pranked on that one.  NJOY offered a 35% discount on vape kits, e-liquids, recharge kits and flavor chambers, but it was only good for April Fool’s Day.  Greensmoke, owned by Altria offered a three-day coupon for $10 off $45 or more in purchases.

greenEveryone seems to want you to celebrate spring by using more nicotine products.  Greensmoke had a spring-themed ad advertising their new green battery with ageneralsnus heart made out of tobacco leaves.   I’m sure some will want to go “green” and use this, but we are sure this isn’t what they mean by going green.  Did we get the word “green” in there enough times?  While Greensmoke is pushing their new battery, General Snus is promoting the “pure ingredients” in their products.  You have to go to their website to see the list, but from the picture, it looks like the makings of a margarita with the lime and salt.  The two cans shown are for mint and “white,” whatever that is.  Do they offer a scratch and sniff area on the can so you can get an idea of what’s inside?  If you are all about buying USA products, Vuse is pushing their “designed and assembled in the USA product.”  It does not say the parts were made here, just designed and assembled.  If the “made in the USA” doesn’t grab you, they had a special trial offer for only $1.  Totally affordable for everyone, including youth.

The latest Grizzly ad is almost insulting men as they present the “Pro Tips” Challenge. Share a tip and be entered to win weekly prizes.  This ad asks “What’s the best way to fix a leaky pipe?” Calling someone who knows what they are doing probably isn’t the sort of tip they are looking for.  Seems like they are scraping the bottom of the barrel for contest ideas.  Red Seal is giving you 25% more in the can so you can spend more time fishing and less time running to the store.  They also have a discussion group on their website.

On a brighter note, New Orleans’ smokefree ordinance went into effect on April 22nd. And six days later Marlboro was ready with a sweepstake to win a trip to the Big Easy.  Does that surprise you?  One of the pictures in the ad shows someone holding a cigarette, which if you read above, is no longer allowed inside.  If you “want the real deal,” perhaps you need to leave the cigs at home since smoking will be restricted.

You know about all the health problems when you use tobacco, but one of the latest articles about a study conducted in the U.S. states that vapor from electronic cigarettes”disrupts cells in the same way as tobacco smoke.”  It appears the safest cigarette, smokeless, or electronic product is the one you don’t use.

Click HERE to read more about the April 2015 tobacco ads.

 

Posted in Cigarettes, Diseases, E-Cigarettes, Smokeless tobacco, Smoking, Tobacco market | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Living in the Real World

It is always interesting to hear the perspectives of college students on smoking bans for their school. While some applaud their college or university for taking a stand on smoking and tobacco use on campus, others seem to be against any type of regulation that takes away a personal freedom.  At one such institution of higher education the administration recently received legislation from their student government to “permanently ban smoking on campus.”   If approved and implemented the proposal would not only ban the use of tobacco, but would ban the “sales of all tobacco products on campus.”

The reason for the ban is that students feel that smoking “no longer has a place on campus,” and one student who wrote the article for the school paper has an issue with this, sort of.  He admits “cigarettes and chewing tobacco are horrendous for the human body,” cause cancer and the campus would be healthier without them.  He says use of these products doesn’t make sense, while at the same time admitting he does use the products. He believes that the ban only serves as a buffer between “the young adult” phase the students are in now and “the real world,” and will “further misinform students to the real world.”

Mr. Student, a smoking ban on your campus will reflect the “real world,” but your state is very pro-tobacco so this measure may seem harsh.  As of January 2014, “28 states have enacted statewide bans on smoking in all enclosed places, including all bars and restaurants. Many hotels and motels ban smoking, as do many hospitals.  In the “real world” many employers may not hire a smoker and if they do, you can expect to pay higher health insurance costs out of your own pocket.   And if you want to find that special person to share your life with, you may have a more difficult time as 58% of respondents on Match.com said “they absolutely would not consider dating a smoker.”

You complain that putting a smoking ban in place will no longer teach you “how to healthily operate in a world filled with dangerous, unhealthy things” because these things have been removed.  I bet if you think back to your younger days, you will remember your parents also removed the “dangerous, unhealthy things” like cleaning products and yard chemicals out of your reach to keep you healthy and safe until such time that you could be taught that these things were dangerous unless handled correctly and used in the manner they were intended.

diagramSo, Mr. Student, go back and read what you wrote: tobacco is horrendous to the human body.  It harms nearly every organ of the body.   It contains 599 ingredients and more than 7,000 chemicals when burned, with at least 69 known to cause cancer.  Most of those chemicals you would never, ever consider consuming.  And if nearly 70% of adult cigarette smokers want to quit smoking, what does that tell you about cigarettes?

you are lucky to live in a time where an abundance of information on the dangers of tobacco can be found and that the tobacco companies can no longer refute.  You are still young and quitting will be easier for you now then if you wait because, let’s face it, you will only make yourself sicker the longer you smoke.  1-800-QUIT-NOW.

Click HERE for the entire article.

 

 

 

Posted in Cigarettes, Diseases, Smoking | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment