Green But Not Friendly

Tobacco advertisements are interesting reading these days.  Gone are the days when tobacco companies could promote they had “scientific evidence on the effect of smoking,” using famous celebrities of the day.  Today’s ads are jumping on the bandwagon of the times and going green, trying to push the eco-friendliness of the tobacco product.  Exactly how can R.J. Reynolds Natural American Spirit cigarettes suddenly become eco-friendly, when they sell a product known to kill over 5 million people every year worldwide?  Does organically-grown, “additive-free” make these cigarettes any less deadly?

First, you need to know what the words “eco-friendly” mean.  According to Wikipedia, the term is used to refer to goods and services which “claim to inflict minimal or no harm on the environment.”  What a great product.  No harm on the environment must mean that their cigarettes are somehow different then the other tons of cigarette litter that is flicked onto beaches, sidewalks and roadways every year around the world.   Their cigarettes still contain a cellulose acetate filter which can take decades to degrade and the tars and nicotine in those filters are deadly to wildlife.  No points scored here on being better for the environment.

Second, organically-grown products are grown without the use of synthetic fertilizers or pesticides; however, compost and manure can generally be used as fertilizer. The company claims they don’t use “…Tobacco Additives, Tobacco Preservatives, Tobacco Flavorings, Reconstituted Sheet Tobacco, Scrap Tobacco, Processed Stems, or Expanded Tobacco” in their product.  If they don’t use “tobacco additives or preservatives,” do they use other types of additives or preservatives?  When these cigarettes are past their expiration date, does the company throw them away versus grinding them up and adding them to new tobacco like they do when manufacturing other cigarettes?  Do they clean to tobacco to get rid of any outside pollutants?

Third, using the words “addictive-free” makes the cigarette sound as if it is safe, but it is not.  In Europe, where Natural American Spirit is also sold, the levels for tar, nicotine and carbon monoxide are much lower than here in the U.S.  The yellow pack sold in Germany contains 5 mg of tar, 0.6 mg of nicotine and 6 mg of carbon monoxide, while here in the U.S. the yellow packs has 10.9 mg of tar, 1.30 mg of nicotine.  Carbon monoxide levels remain the same.   The brown pack has a staggering 27.9 mg of tar and 2.72 mg of nicotine.  Carbon monoxide levels for the brown pack aren’t even given.  R.J. Reynolds can claim their product is addictive-free, but it appears that cigarettes sold in the U.S. are more addictive with twice the amount of nicotine as the European counterparts.

To be fair, the company isn’t saying this brand of cigarettes is safer, just that they are manufacturing them greener.  The facilities are wind-powered, the farmers use fewer chemicals and 70% of its sales staff drive hybrid vehicles.   And if you are worried about all that litter, don’t be.  A sister company helps fund Keep America Beautiful.  Our product makes a mess, but we pay someone to clean it up.

If you really like their product, you can sign up to receive a green birthday card from them.  Just plant the card and wildflowers will grow.  Sort of like pushing up daisies.

Click here to read more.

This entry was posted in Big Tobacco, Cigarettes, International, Tobacco market and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Green But Not Friendly

  1. David says:

    I will bet that Pharma drugs are far more dangerous than American Spirit cigarettes. Let us have a discussion on all the other things people do that are far,far worse than additve-free cigarettes.

    Cigarette smoking has gone from 43% to 18% over the past 50 years, yet cancer rates have doubled. So, this means that there are other things contributing to this …..processed food, Pharma drugs and stress. Processed food is to commercial cigarettes. Since they started putting additives in cigarettes in the late 60’s early 70’s, the health of smokers became worse. Additives in our food has done the same thing to the health of people…..this could explain why cancer rates have doubled when cigarette smoking went down. I think additive-free organic cigarettes are harmless. We need a study to follow the effects of additive free organic cigarettes on people. I suspect that our food is the biggest culprit to disease far beyond additive free organic cigarettes.

    • Cancer is a strange disease. It strikes those who are smokers, those who are former smokers, and those who have never smoked. Smoking can cause damage to your DNA, possibly causing those you pass your genes onto to become more susceptible to diseases. People are eating more processed food and more of our food contains high fructose corn syrup and GMOs. I have no doubt that many of our foods are damaging us. Doing a study of organic cigarettes would be difficult because most of the cigarettes are not “organic.” Organic tobacco means tobacco with absolutely no flavorings added and it would be very harsh and almost unsmokeable. You would also have to literally put the test subjects in a very controlled environment so they would/could not eat anything that wasn’t provided to them. As for drugs, chronic disease caused by cigarette smoke is forcing me to use Big Pharma drugs. These drugs are allowing me to have a “normal” day-to-day existence I would not be able to enjoy otherwise. In many cases if people would put down the fork and just walk, it would help them to get off the drugs they take for many of their health problems.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s